RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Few studies compared lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS) and standard double pigtail plastic stents (PS) for the endoscopic drainage of pancreatic walled-off necrosis (WON). Albeit sometimes large, previously described cohorts display considerable heterogeneity and often pooled together data from several centers, involving multiple operators and techniques. Moreover, they often lack a control group for the comparison of outcomes. AIM: to compare clinical efficacy and safety of PS versus LAMS for the endoscopic drainage of infected WON. METHODS: Single-centre, 1:1 case-control study. We compared patients undergoing endoscopic drainages of infected WON through LAMS (cases) or PS (controls). The primary endpoint was the clinical efficacy (resolution of the WON/sepsis), the secondary endpoint was safety (procedure-related complications). RESULTS: Thirty patients were enrolled between 2011 and 2017. Cases and controls were homogeneous in terms of etiology and clinical characteristics. 93% of cases and 86.7% of controls were clinically successfully treated, with no significant differences in rates of post-operative infections, bleedings and stent migrations (respectively 13.3% vs 21.4%; p=0.65; 13.3% vs 0%; p=0.48; 13.3% vs 7.1%; p=1.00). No difference was shown regarding the need for additional percutaneous or surgical treatments (33.3% vs 13.3%; p=0.39). Cases, however, displayed a significantly prolonged mean hospital stay (90.2 days vs 18.5 days; p<0.01) and a higher mean number of endoscopic procedures per patient (4.8 vs 1.5; p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: PS might be not inferior to LAMS for the treatment WONs. Further prospective RCT is needed to compare clinical efficacy and safety in the two groups.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The increasing age of the population and prolonged life expectancy result in a widening of age limit criteria for a variety of surgical procedures. Oesophagectomy and total gastrectomy are complex operations associated with significant risks of post-operative complications. METHODS: This is a single-centre cohort study of patients operated with curative intent due to oesophageal or gastric cancer. RESULTS: From 2007 to 2017, 548 patients underwent surgery with curative intent, with 122 patients (22.3%) classified as elderly (≥75 years). There was no difference in total complication rates between the groups. The adjusted odds ratio for 90-day mortality after oesophageal resection in the elderly group was 3.65 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.33-10.03) and after gastrectomy was 1.62 (95% CI: 0.55-4.79). The adjusted hazard ratio for 1-year mortality after oesophagectomy was 2.29 (95% CI: 1.25-4.19), and after gastrectomy the adjusted hazard ratio was 1.48 (95% CI: 0.75-2.92). In the event of a complication with Clavien-Dindo score IIIb or higher, there was a statistically significant increase of 90-day mortality to over 50% among elderly patients both after oesophagectomy and gastrectomy (50.0% versus 19.8%; P = 0.005 and 57.1% versus 17.4%; P = 0.012, respectively). CONCLUSION: There is a statistically significant increase in 90-day mortality after oesophageal and gastric cancer surgery in elderly compared with younger patients. Post-operative complications with high Clavien-Dindo score in patients undergoing oesophagectomy or gastrectomy, with age ≥75 years, are a dramatic risk factor for post-operative death.
